<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/twitter-and-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/twitter-and-blogging/</link>
	<description>programming, politics, &#38; other religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: wan acceleration</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/twitter-and-blogging/#comment-34105</link>
		<dc:creator>wan acceleration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=660#comment-34105</guid>
		<description>John sums up telepresence from a network perspective, &quot;Telepresence is an interactive real- time application, which means it is delay sensitive, loss sensitive and jitter sensitive. This sounds familiar: it is just like VoIP, with the one difference being that it has huge bandwidth requirements.&quot; It&#039;s that last part that makes things more difficult. No form of QoS can allocate bandwidth that doesn&#039;t exist and it doesn&#039;t have provisions to force the application to downscale the experience based on realtime metrics. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John sums up telepresence from a network perspective, &#8220;Telepresence is an interactive real- time application, which means it is delay sensitive, loss sensitive and jitter sensitive. This sounds familiar: it is just like VoIP, with the one difference being that it has huge bandwidth requirements.&#8221; It&#8217;s that last part that makes things more difficult. No form of QoS can allocate bandwidth that doesn&#8217;t exist and it doesn&#8217;t have provisions to force the application to downscale the experience based on realtime metrics. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

