<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby on Rails: One Thumb Up, One Thumb Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/ruby-on-rails-one-thumb-up-one-thumb-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/ruby-on-rails-one-thumb-up-one-thumb-down/</link>
	<description>programming, politics, &#38; other religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby is the Future &#124; Enfranchised Mind</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/ruby-on-rails-one-thumb-up-one-thumb-down/#comment-34314</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby is the Future &#124; Enfranchised Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2006/06/25/143#comment-34314</guid>
		<description>[...] a whole lifetime of ranting against it (cite, cite, cite, cite), I finally have to eat my words, come out, and say it: Ruby is the language of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a whole lifetime of ranting against it (cite, cite, cite, cite), I finally have to eat my words, come out, and say it: Ruby is the language of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhurt-aw</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/ruby-on-rails-one-thumb-up-one-thumb-down/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>bhurt-aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2006/06/25/143#comment-372</guid>
		<description>All engineering is tradeoffs.  It&#039;s a lot easier to get conceptual cleanliness if you can take other aspects- like performance- out of the equation, i.e. it doesn&#039;t matter how much performance suffers to get that cleanliness.

And performance suffers- take a look at Ruby&#039;s performance results on &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=all&amp;lang=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Great Computer Language Shootout&lt;/a&gt;.  Ocaml weighs in at 64% the speed of C, Ruby 5%.  Ocaml is one of the fastest non-C-like languages (i.e. not including C, C++, or D).  Ruby&#039;s performance is down with SmallTalk and PHP, it&#039;s slower than Perl, it&#039;s slower than TCL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All engineering is tradeoffs.  It&#8217;s a lot easier to get conceptual cleanliness if you can take other aspects- like performance- out of the equation, i.e. it doesn&#8217;t matter how much performance suffers to get that cleanliness.</p>
<p>And performance suffers- take a look at Ruby&#8217;s performance results on <a HREF="http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=all&amp;lang=all" rel="nofollow">The Great Computer Language Shootout</a>.  Ocaml weighs in at 64% the speed of C, Ruby 5%.  Ocaml is one of the fastest non-C-like languages (i.e. not including C, C++, or D).  Ruby&#8217;s performance is down with SmallTalk and PHP, it&#8217;s slower than Perl, it&#8217;s slower than TCL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

