<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New PeriodicalUpdater Feature, and, Mutable Data Sucks: A Case in Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/periodicalupdater-and-mutable-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/periodicalupdater-and-mutable-data/</link>
	<description>programming, politics, &#38; other religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohum</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/periodicalupdater-and-mutable-data/#comment-36997</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1978#comment-36997</guid>
		<description>Ah, apologies, I&#039;m a new reader :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, apologies, I&#8217;m a new reader :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fischer</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/periodicalupdater-and-mutable-data/#comment-36995</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1978#comment-36995</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m very aware.  You may want to check out the blog posts under &quot;Most Popular Posts&quot; in the left sidebar of this blog, because functional programming evangelism and discussion is one of the main themes around here.  Part of the reason I&#039;m bringing these cases to the attention of the readers is to help people get why I am so hung up on functional programming.

One of the things that surprised me back at the last JavaOne is how far Clojure gets with immutability and dynamic typing.  I&#039;ve advocated before that static typing and functional programming go hand-in-hand (see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/functional-programming-typing-and-closures/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Functional Programming, Typing, and Closures&lt;/a&gt; post for more on that), but Clojure&#039;s making me re-think that somewhat.  It&#039;s amazing how far they get with just immutability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m very aware.  You may want to check out the blog posts under &#8220;Most Popular Posts&#8221; in the left sidebar of this blog, because functional programming evangelism and discussion is one of the main themes around here.  Part of the reason I&#8217;m bringing these cases to the attention of the readers is to help people get why I am so hung up on functional programming.</p>
<p>One of the things that surprised me back at the last JavaOne is how far Clojure gets with immutability and dynamic typing.  I&#8217;ve advocated before that static typing and functional programming go hand-in-hand (see the <a href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/functional-programming-typing-and-closures/" rel="nofollow">Functional Programming, Typing, and Closures</a> post for more on that), but Clojure&#8217;s making me re-think that somewhat.  It&#8217;s amazing how far they get with just immutability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohum</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/periodicalupdater-and-mutable-data/#comment-36994</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1978#comment-36994</guid>
		<description>You probably already know this, but it&#039;s actually an entire paradigm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency_(computer_science)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably already know this, but it&#8217;s actually an entire paradigm:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency_(computer_science)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency_(computer_science)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

