<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Interview Questions and Sort Routines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/</link>
	<description>programming, politics, &#38; other religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/#comment-34401</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1120#comment-34401</guid>
		<description>James: a book you might want to check out is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Pragmatic-Thinking-Learning-Refactor-Programmers/dp/1934356050/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1239658664&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pragmatic Thinking and Learning&lt;/A&gt;.  The paper I linked to, The Programmers Stone, also has some good advice (well, up until the point where it wanders off into lala land, but that&#039;s a different post).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: a book you might want to check out is <a HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Pragmatic-Thinking-Learning-Refactor-Programmers/dp/1934356050/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1239658664&#038;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">Pragmatic Thinking and Learning</a>.  The paper I linked to, The Programmers Stone, also has some good advice (well, up until the point where it wanders off into lala land, but that&#8217;s a different post).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Jackson</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/#comment-34400</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1120#comment-34400</guid>
		<description>I heartily agree with this post.

I am amazed at the number of people I&#039;ve interviewed that can&#039;t answer basic CS 101 programming questions.  People with 5+ years experience, fresh out of school, or with PhD&#039;s.  It&#039;s embarrassing to interview such people, and it&#039;s embarrassing how many such interviews I&#039;ve given...

If you can&#039;t recreate the answers to CS 101 questions, then you&#039;re not worth hiring.

Talk is cheap, programmers looking for jobs should be expected to program during the interview.

Additionally, if you expect to hire the best (or even &quot;good&quot;) programmers, then you&#039;d better interview like it.  Good programmers will shy away from companies that only ask easy, non-technical, non-programming questions during interviews.  Remember, as an interviewer, you&#039;re also selling the company/job to the person you&#039;re interviewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heartily agree with this post.</p>
<p>I am amazed at the number of people I&#8217;ve interviewed that can&#8217;t answer basic CS 101 programming questions.  People with 5+ years experience, fresh out of school, or with PhD&#8217;s.  It&#8217;s embarrassing to interview such people, and it&#8217;s embarrassing how many such interviews I&#8217;ve given&#8230;</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t recreate the answers to CS 101 questions, then you&#8217;re not worth hiring.</p>
<p>Talk is cheap, programmers looking for jobs should be expected to program during the interview.</p>
<p>Additionally, if you expect to hire the best (or even &#8220;good&#8221;) programmers, then you&#8217;d better interview like it.  Good programmers will shy away from companies that only ask easy, non-technical, non-programming questions during interviews.  Remember, as an interviewer, you&#8217;re also selling the company/job to the person you&#8217;re interviewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fischer</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/#comment-34374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1120#comment-34374</guid>
		<description>@James

If you &quot;get the concepts down&quot;, but can&#039;t code it up in a language you&#039;re familiar with, you don&#039;t really have the concepts down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James</p>
<p>If you &#8220;get the concepts down&#8221;, but can&#8217;t code it up in a language you&#8217;re familiar with, you don&#8217;t really have the concepts down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jackson</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/#comment-34371</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1120#comment-34371</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a terrible programmer.  You see, I can get the concepts down of something simple like a linked list, but when it comes time to write one I&#039;m always looking at books to make sure I have the actual code down.

Every once in a while I try to force myself to just sit down and write one without referring to any books, but I never come up with a good solution.  Do you have any advice for someone like me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a terrible programmer.  You see, I can get the concepts down of something simple like a linked list, but when it comes time to write one I&#8217;m always looking at books to make sure I have the actual code down.</p>
<p>Every once in a while I try to force myself to just sit down and write one without referring to any books, but I never come up with a good solution.  Do you have any advice for someone like me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianstewey</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/on-interview-questions-and-sort-routines/#comment-34370</link>
		<dc:creator>brianstewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=1120#comment-34370</guid>
		<description>Since I commented on your original post and I guess this article is about me, I would request all who read this post to read the original post and the comments spoken of, before engaging the author in the content of this self gratifiying post.

I would also like to say the following content of this post are fictional.

&quot;Those objecting to my post were packers. I’m thinking like a mapper.&quot;
No one objected to your post, this is completely false. Also please don&#039;t call me a packer I could take insult to that if I wasn&#039;t so thick skinned.

&quot;This is exactly how the respondents were treating the sorting question: as a information packet.&quot;
I can&#039;t speak for everyone but I didn&#039;t do that. Your post was about &quot;real programmers&quot; not about sorting algorithms, I used your section about sorting questions in interviews as leverage for my argument that you in fact consider yourself to a real programmer, whether you are aware of it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I commented on your original post and I guess this article is about me, I would request all who read this post to read the original post and the comments spoken of, before engaging the author in the content of this self gratifiying post.</p>
<p>I would also like to say the following content of this post are fictional.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those objecting to my post were packers. I’m thinking like a mapper.&#8221;<br />
No one objected to your post, this is completely false. Also please don&#8217;t call me a packer I could take insult to that if I wasn&#8217;t so thick skinned.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is exactly how the respondents were treating the sorting question: as a information packet.&#8221;<br />
I can&#8217;t speak for everyone but I didn&#8217;t do that. Your post was about &#8220;real programmers&#8221; not about sorting algorithms, I used your section about sorting questions in interviews as leverage for my argument that you in fact consider yourself to a real programmer, whether you are aware of it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

