Comments on: Hpricot Does Namespaces? http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces/ programming, politics, & other religious issues Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Robert Fischer http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces/#comment-36842 Robert Fischer Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:40:56 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=645#comment-36842 If you haven't checked out the "Simplificator" link above, do so. Turns out support is drastically overstated. If you haven’t checked out the “Simplificator” link above, do so. Turns out support is drastically overstated.

]]> By: simplificator » Blog Archive » Hpricot and Namespaces/XPath http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces/#comment-36841 simplificator » Blog Archive » Hpricot and Namespaces/XPath Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:15:38 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=645#comment-36841 [...] http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces [...] [...] http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces [...]

]]> By: Robert Fischer http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces/#comment-33336 Robert Fischer Fri, 30 May 2008 14:38:31 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=645#comment-33336 What do you suspect is its failing? There's no concept of "registering" a namespace (a la XmlSlurper), so I think it's actually just picking up prefix. That might be passable for me. Is there something else you're thinking about? What do you suspect is its failing?

There’s no concept of “registering” a namespace (a la XmlSlurper), so I think it’s actually just picking up prefix. That might be passable for me.

Is there something else you’re thinking about?

]]> By: Bob Aman http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/hpricot-does-namespaces/#comment-33335 Bob Aman Fri, 30 May 2008 04:17:26 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/?p=645#comment-33335 I'll believe it when I see it. My suspicious is that it doesn't actually work, but I'm too lazy to write the code to prove it. Was planning to just throw some XML I know will break an incorrect implementation at Cullect, but ran into some other issues with his Atom handling code that prevented me from being able to run those tests. But I'm confident enough that Hpricot's .%() syntax won't do namespaces correctly that it's not bothering me that I don't have a verifiable answer yet. I’ll believe it when I see it. My suspicious is that it doesn’t actually work, but I’m too lazy to write the code to prove it. Was planning to just throw some XML I know will break an incorrect implementation at Cullect, but ran into some other issues with his Atom handling code that prevented me from being able to run those tests. But I’m confident enough that Hpricot’s .%() syntax won’t do namespaces correctly that it’s not bothering me that I don’t have a verifiable answer yet.

]]>