<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Don&#8217;t Need Anonymous Inner Classes for Groovy/Grails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/</link>
	<description>programming, politics, &#38; other religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fischer</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/#comment-37004</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/why-we-dont-need-anonymous-inner-classes-for-groovygrails/#comment-37004</guid>
		<description>@da

You can&#039;t.  See the conversation above.

The good news for you is that anonymous inner classes are supported in Groovy 1.7, which will be released any day now.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@da</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t.  See the conversation above.</p>
<p>The good news for you is that anonymous inner classes are supported in Groovy 1.7, which will be released any day now.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: da</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/#comment-37003</link>
		<dc:creator>da</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/why-we-dont-need-anonymous-inner-classes-for-groovygrails/#comment-37003</guid>
		<description>how to override abstract classes with no default constructor in groovy without creating a new concrete class?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to override abstract classes with no default constructor in groovy without creating a new concrete class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Broadfoot</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/#comment-34284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Broadfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/why-we-dont-need-anonymous-inner-classes-for-groovygrails/#comment-34284</guid>
		<description>Here is a more thorough explanation for anyone that wants to replace anonymous inner classes that implement interfaces in Groovy:

http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+way+to+implement+interfaces</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a more thorough explanation for anyone that wants to replace anonymous inner classes that implement interfaces in Groovy:</p>
<p><a href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+way+to+implement+interfaces" rel="nofollow">http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+way+to+implement+interfaces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/#comment-34280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/why-we-dont-need-anonymous-inner-classes-for-groovygrails/#comment-34280</guid>
		<description>Although I do agree that the coercion is a much better way to write the code.  Support for anonymous inner classes is also very high on the list of things I&#039;d like to see in Groovy.   I really don&#039;t care to use them, however since Groovy is always presented as a superset of Java I think that it is very important to be able to take a .java file and rename it to .groovy and have it work.   My current project was in need of some dynamic typing, and we choose Groovy as we figured it would be the best option to port straight from Java to Groovy.  It wasn&#039;t bad ( about 2 weeks work ) but there were a few things like anonymous inner classes that I was disappointed to see unsupported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I do agree that the coercion is a much better way to write the code.  Support for anonymous inner classes is also very high on the list of things I&#8217;d like to see in Groovy.   I really don&#8217;t care to use them, however since Groovy is always presented as a superset of Java I think that it is very important to be able to take a .java file and rename it to .groovy and have it work.   My current project was in need of some dynamic typing, and we choose Groovy as we figured it would be the best option to port straight from Java to Groovy.  It wasn&#8217;t bad ( about 2 weeks work ) but there were a few things like anonymous inner classes that I was disappointed to see unsupported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R. MacIver &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We don&#8217;t need anonymous inner classes? Bollocks to that.</title>
		<link>http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/anonymous-inner-class-groovy-grails/#comment-34278</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. MacIver &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We don&#8217;t need anonymous inner classes? Bollocks to that.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/why-we-dont-need-anonymous-inner-classes-for-groovygrails/#comment-34278</guid>
		<description>[...] Fischer over at enfranchisedmind.com has a post about anonymous inner classes which I am forced to disagree with quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fischer over at enfranchisedmind.com has a post about anonymous inner classes which I am forced to disagree with quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

