The paper that BHurt and I co-authored for TFP 2007 wasn’t accepted. There was a lot of positive feedback about the core of the paper, but they weren’t so keen on the execution. I’m a bit frustrated right now, because I expected TFP to be predominantly academic in focus, and so the paper had that focus in mind — but the feedback all said that they wanted more case examples, and less high-level conversation. It turned out that the amount of effort that went into building an academic backbone and cites left the reviewers feeling like there was an empty foundation.

Good topic, good approach, but issues on the implementation. Blargh.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS