Comments on: Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax - Yahoo! News http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2006/01/30/experts-claim-official-911-story-is-a-hoax-yahoo-news/ Robert Fischer and Brian Hurt on Punditry, Programming Languages, and Other Religious Issues Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:06:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Enfranchised Mind » Blog Archive » The Patriot Act http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2006/01/30/experts-claim-official-911-story-is-a-hoax-yahoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-88 Enfranchised Mind » Blog Archive » The Patriot Act Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:35:35 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2006/01/30/63#comment-88 [...] used the 9/11 attacks to not be prevented. Assuming that the existing explaination is not a hoax, and that the public story is accurate for all political purposes (which [...] [...] used the 9/11 attacks to not be prevented. Assuming that the existing explaination is not a hoax, and that the public story is accurate for all political purposes (which [...]

]]> By: Candide http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2006/01/30/experts-claim-official-911-story-is-a-hoax-yahoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-87 Candide Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:05:27 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2006/01/30/63#comment-87 Did a little poking around on the named experts. It's quite a group. <em>Bob Bowman</em>: <a href="http://www.rmbowman.com/ssn/bio2001.htm" rel="nofollow">Self-Written Bio</a>, 22 year career Air Force officer and now President of "Institute for Space and Security Studies" (whatever that is) <em>James Fetzer</em>: <a href="http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/" rel="nofollow">Homepage</a>, Professor of Philosophy at U of MN-Duluth. <em>Wayne Madsen</em>: <a href="http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/" rel="nofollow">Bloggy-thing</a>, liberal activist...? <em>John McMurty</em>: <a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/philosophy/faculty/jmcmurtry.shtml" rel="nofollow">Homepage</a>, Professor of Philosophy at U of Guelph(?) <em>Morgan Reynolds</em>: <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html" rel="nofollow">Post on LewRockwell.com</a>, Professor Emeritus at Texas A&M, Chief Economist for US Dept. of Labor 01-02 <em>Andreas von Buelow</em>: <a href="http://911review.com/articles/vonbuelow/tagesspiegel.html" rel="nofollow">translation of article</a>, former German Cabinet Minister of Technology Not sure I'm willing to follow where they're leading, but they bring up some particularly weird points that I wouldn't mind hearing an answer to. Did a little poking around on the named experts. It’s quite a group.

Bob Bowman: Self-Written Bio, 22 year career Air Force officer and now President of “Institute for Space and Security Studies” (whatever that is)
James Fetzer: Homepage, Professor of Philosophy at U of MN-Duluth.
Wayne Madsen: Bloggy-thing, liberal activist…?
John McMurty: Homepage, Professor of Philosophy at U of Guelph(?)
Morgan Reynolds: Post on LewRockwell.com, Professor Emeritus at Texas A&M, Chief Economist for US Dept. of Labor 01-02
Andreas von Buelow: translation of article, former German Cabinet Minister of Technology

Not sure I’m willing to follow where they’re leading, but they bring up some particularly weird points that I wouldn’t mind hearing an answer to.

]]> By: Candide http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2006/01/30/experts-claim-official-911-story-is-a-hoax-yahoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Candide Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:17:46 +0000 http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2006/01/30/63#comment-76 There was actually something put out onto community television that I bumped into which spawned the original "9/11 Conspiracy Theory" posts. The production quality was crap (a la a high school student with VideoToaster), and the narration was your standard conspiracy-theory hype ("They deny all wrongdoing and stick to the original report -- WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE FROM US!?!? WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!?!?! ARE THEY EATING BABIES?!?!?"). Because of that, I didn't put much stock in what few facts were presented, but I've always been fond of watching/reading that kind of stuff. I may have been a bit quick to dismiss them. There was actually something put out onto community television that I bumped into which spawned the original “9/11 Conspiracy Theory” posts. The production quality was crap (a la a high school student with VideoToaster), and the narration was your standard conspiracy-theory hype (”They deny all wrongdoing and stick to the original report — WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE FROM US!?!? WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!?!?! ARE THEY EATING BABIES?!?!?”). Because of that, I didn’t put much stock in what few facts were presented, but I’ve always been fond of watching/reading that kind of stuff. I may have been a bit quick to dismiss them.

]]>